Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 99

Thread: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

  1. #1

    Default WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    We've just dipped our toe into conference play, but I'm curious what you think about the current regional rankings. Here is how I would see it based on the first month of the season.

    1. Northwest Mo. St.
    2. Missouri Southern
    3. Southern Nazarene
    4. MSU Mankato
    5. Washburn
    6. St. Cloud
    7. Sioux Falls
    8. Northern St.
    9. Wayne St.
    10. Pittsburgh St.

  2. #2

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Flip Southern and NW.

  3. Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    This early, the exact order is not overly important. I do think you've named 10 teams that we could see in the regional talk near season's end - all have had very solid starts and look to have some talented rosters and good coaching.

    With SNU getting blown out by 30, they may not deserve to be quite so high. I think the best teams find ways to keep it close even during cold-shooting nights, but the Storm was blown away at SEOK.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Belton, MO
    Posts
    2,814
    Rep Power
    267474

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Lose by 1 or lose by 30, it doesn't matter. Unless things have changed, margin of victory is nowhere to found in the regional ranking criteria.

  5. Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Sorry Randy, thought we were looking for opinions here. Sounds like it's all formula based and therefore could someone just post the ratings and no followup comments are necessary?

  6. #6

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by NWHoops View Post
    Flip Southern and NW.
    My thoughts as well.

  7. #7

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    I think Mo. Southern and NWMS should be 1 and 2 in either order. I feel like Wayne State should be higher. They have had an excellent season so far and have several quality wins. Pitt State could be a little higher. Washburn is about right (4,5 or 6) and I am not sure about everyone else. I do know that Southern Naz. is legit. I am not sure what happened to them in their last game but some times things can spiral in a bad way out on the road. They have size, athleticism and very good guard play. Should be a fun season.
    Last edited by Btech#3; 12-10-2018 at 01:42 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Lake of the Ozarks
    Posts
    1,422
    Rep Power
    60552

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by NWHoops View Post
    Flip Southern and NW.
    In fact, move NW down to 5 below Washburn.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    16,667
    Rep Power
    678930

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    I don't care where they are at, just seeing Wayne on the list brings tears to my eyes

    :)

  10. #10

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    That would work. Why is NW even on the list? :)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4,831
    Rep Power
    179455

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Btech#3 View Post
    That would work. Why is NW even on the list? :)
    Culture wins

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    God's Country- between Buffalo Lake & Hector
    Posts
    46,022
    Rep Power
    1000000

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Augieholic View Post
    Culture wins


    Oops! I thought you said Culture Club. Sorry!

  13. #13

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Despite the most recent disturbing post to this thread, I thought I'd bump it with my current regional rankings. I went to 12 teams to get the GAC in.

    1. Northwest Missouri State
    2. Washburn
    3. Northern State
    4. Missouri Southern
    5. Sioux Falls
    6. Pittsburg State
    7. Minnesota State
    8. St. Cloud State
    9. Lincoln (Mo.)
    10. Wayne State (Neb.)
    11. Southern Nazarene
    12. Southern Arkansas

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    22,553
    Rep Power
    1000000

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    FWIW, schnautza's PI for the region (hope I didn't omit anybody).

    Quote Originally Posted by schnautza View Post
    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional%
    3 Northwest Missouri State Central MIAA 13-0 100.00% 17.08 47.64% 56.90% 12-0 100.00%
    20 Washburn Central MIAA 9-3 75.00% 15.42 57.86% 50.36% 8-3 72.73%
    28 Pittsburg State Central MIAA 10-3 76.92% 14.92 51.59% 52.85% 9-3 75.00%
    36 Lincoln (Mo.) Central MIAA 9-3 75.00% 14.75 49.61% 51.89% 9-3 75.00%
    39 Sioux Falls Central NSIC 11-4 73.33% 14.60 52.05% 50.86% 11-4 73.33%
    42 Southern Nazarene Central GAC 13-3 81.25% 14.44 41.93% 53.60% 12-3 80.00%
    46 Southern Arkansas Central GAC 10-2 83.33% 14.25 40.30% 52.28% 10-2 83.33%
    47 Missouri Southern Central MIAA 10-3 76.92% 14.23 48.99% 55.65% 10-3 76.92%
    49 Northern State Central NSIC 13-3 81.25% 14.19 44.70% 52.47% 12-3 80.00%
    57 St. Cloud State Central NSIC 11-4 73.33% 14.00 48.61% 53.93% 9-4 69.23%
    57 Minnesota State Central NSIC 11-4 73.33% 14.00 47.88% 54.17% 10-3 76.92%
    63 Wayne State (Neb.) Central NSIC 10-3 76.92% 13.92 44.12% 55.21% 10-3 76.92%
    84 Lindenwood Central MIAA 6-8 42.86% 13.36 70.16% 48.07% 4-6 40.00%
    91 Central Missouri Central MIAA 7-6 53.85% 13.15 54.52% 52.05% 7-6 53.85%
    94 Fort Hays State Central MIAA 7-4 63.64% 13.09 48.48% 51.76% 7-4 63.64%
    95 Augustana Central NSIC 10-5 66.67% 13.00 47.87% 50.84% 10-5 66.67%
    103 East Central Central GAC 7-5 58.33% 12.83 48.63% 50.08% 6-5 54.55%
    108 Southeastern Oklahoma State Central GAC 7-4 63.64% 12.73 43.88% 49.93% 7-4 63.64%
    117 Central Oklahoma Central MIAA 6-7 46.15% 12.38 55.76% 49.66% 6-7 46.15%
    126 Henderson State Central GAC 7-5 58.33% 12.17 46.13% 49.96% 7-5 58.33%
    147 Arkansas-Monticello Central GAC 7-4 63.64% 11.82 37.68% 51.32% 7-4 63.64%
    166 MSU Moorhead Central NSIC 7-5 58.33% 11.33 39.46% 56.63% 7-3 70.00%
    178 Emporia State Central MIAA 4-7 36.36% 11.09 56.28% 50.66% 4-7 36.36%
    187 Missouri Western Central MIAA 8-9 47.06% 10.94 46.61% 53.75% 8-8 50.00%
    197 Upper Iowa Central NSIC 6-10 37.50% 10.69 53.57% 49.55% 6-10 37.50%
    201 Ouachita Baptist Central GAC 5-6 45.45% 10.64 45.80% 49.89% 5-6 45.45%
    202 Harding Central GAC 3-9 25.00% 10.58 63.63% 45.52% 3-9 25.00%
    204 Northeastern State Central MIAA 5-8 38.46% 10.54 50.08% 50.51% 5-8 38.46%
    205 Minnesota Duluth Central NSIC 6-6 50.00% 10.50 44.56% 53.73% 6-6 50.00%
    209 U-Mary Central NSIC 5-9 35.71% 10.43 54.30% 46.59% 5-9 35.71%
    213 Southwest Minnesota State Central NSIC 4-8 33.33% 10.33 59.78% 48.17% 4-8 33.33%
    232 Winona State Central NSIC 3-10 23.08% 9.92 62.14% 46.56% 3-10 23.08%
    238 Southwest Baptist Central MIAA 3-7 30.00% 9.80 51.52% 51.76% 3-7 30.00%
    243 Nebraska Kearney Central MIAA 3-9 25.00% 9.58 55.47% 47.99% 3-9 25.00%
    247 Minot State Central NSIC 3-11 21.43% 9.50 56.54% 47.83% 3-11 21.43%
    251 Bemidji State Central NSIC 2-9 18.18% 9.27 59.88% 47.49% 1-9 10.00%
    261 Northwestern Oklahoma State Central GAC 3-11 21.43% 9.00 57.14% 46.26% 3-11 21.43%
    268 Arkansas Tech Central GAC 3-11 21.43% 8.71 53.47% 46.43% 3-10 23.08%
    278 Southwestern Oklahoma State Central GAC 2-11 15.38% 8.15 55.45% 46.07% 2-11 15.38%
    291 Concordia-St. Paul Central NSIC 4-10 28.57% 7.57 44.11% 52.63% 4-8 33.33%

  15. #15

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Very interesting. NWMS leads by a pretty wide margin. Still early but it looks like 2 thru 10 are really close.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    22,553
    Rep Power
    1000000

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Btech#3 View Post
    Very interesting. NWMS leads by a pretty wide margin. Still early but it looks like 2 thru 10 are really close.
    I didn't realize how many teams already have 3 or 4 losses.

  17. #17

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by Btech#3 View Post
    Very interesting. NWMS leads by a pretty wide margin. Still early but it looks like 2 thru 10 are really close.
    I noticed that too. The gap from 1-2 is the same as 2-12.

  18. Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Maryville is good at hosting regionals. They made the NSIC teams feel really welcome last year.

    (We did our part too - you're welcome Mustangs)

  19. #19

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by MisterWizard View Post
    Maryville is good at hosting regionals. They made the NSIC teams feel really welcome last year.

    (We did our part too - you're welcome Mustangs)
    Folks were nice enough for sure, however until that road improves from the interstate I will very likely never make a return trip.

  20. #20

    Default Re: WAAAAAAYYYY too early Regional Rankings

    Quote Originally Posted by NSU4LIFE View Post
    Folks were nice enough for sure, however until that road improves from the interstate I will very likely never make a return trip.
    Which one did you take?

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •