Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 81 to 95 of 95

Thread: Performance Indicators 2018-19

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ypsilanti, MI
    Posts
    301
    Contribute to D2
    Rep Power
    10212

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Hypothetical GLIAC situation: Say Davenport wins the tournament title. Would the auto-bid go directly to their final opponent (even if it's the #7 or #8 seed)?

  2. #82

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Quote Originally Posted by ftballfan View Post
    Hypothetical GLIAC situation: Say Davenport wins the tournament title. Would the auto-bid go directly to their final opponent (even if it's the #7 or #8 seed)?
    I asked the same question and have not found an official answer. The assumption is the tournament runner up gets the auto bid. This seems to be significantly increasing the chances of an unranked team getting a bid. Considering that an unranked team got the GMAC bid last year, I'd be nervous if my team is ranked 6-8 in the last ranking.

  3. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Quote Originally Posted by Knightmoves View Post
    I asked the same question and have not found an official answer. The assumption is the tournament runner up gets the auto bid. This seems to be significantly increasing the chances of an unranked team getting a bid. Considering that an unranked team got the GMAC bid last year, I'd be nervous if my team is ranked 6-8 in the last ranking.
    Honestly if you are playing a tournament with an automatic bid on the line, a team that is not eligible for the tournament shouldn't be aloud to participate. My guess is that this doesn't happen often, but we will find out in a few weeks.

  4. #84

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Quote Originally Posted by unc4life View Post
    Honestly if you are playing a tournament with an automatic bid on the line, a team that is not eligible for the tournament shouldn't be aloud to participate. My guess is that this doesn't happen often, but we will find out in a few weeks.
    Are you saying there is a chance that Davenport is not participating in the GLIAC tournament? There is no indication on either Davenport's or the GLIAC webcite that they are ineligible for the tournament. Frankly, I think it would be a travesty not to let them play for the league championship, considering they are clearly one of, if not the best team in the league and their ineligibility for the NCAA tournament gives them nothing else for which to play. BTW, Massey rates Davenport 4th in the nation in D2.

  5. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Quote Originally Posted by Knightmoves View Post
    Are you saying there is a chance that Davenport is not participating in the GLIAC tournament? There is no indication on either Davenport's or the GLIAC webcite that they are ineligible for the tournament. Frankly, I think it would be a travesty not to let them play for the league championship, considering they are clearly one of, if not the best team in the league and their ineligibility for the NCAA tournament gives them nothing else for which to play. BTW, Massey rates Davenport 4th in the nation in D2.
    No I think they will play in the tournament. I personally think they shouldn't though. The point of the tournament is to see who gets the automatic bid. If you can't go why should you play in it?

  6. #86

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Really the point of the conference tournament is to determine a champion, not determine the auto bid. Personally, I think conference tournaments are a silly way to determine a champion or the recipient of an auto bid, but if you are going to let a team play in the regular season, you ought to let them play in the conference tournament. Davenport has kind of thrown a wrench in the who set up, good for them! Truth is that Davenport may help the GLIAC get another NCAA bid, because Ashland is in no matter who wins the GLIAC tournament.

  7. #87

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional% Ranked Record Ranked%
    10 Findlay Midwest GMAC 21-3 87.50% 15.92 47.15% 51.20% 21-3 87.50% 2-2 50.0%
    13 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 20-3 86.96% 15.78 44.37% 52.29% 18-3 85.71% 3-2 60.0%
    14 Lewis Midwest GLVC 18-4 81.82% 15.59 52.39% 51.25% 18-4 81.82% 9-1 90.0%
    15 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 20-4 83.33% 15.42 49.46% 52.36% 20-4 83.33% 6-4 60.0%
    25 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 17-5 77.27% 14.95 48.81% 51.60% 17-5 77.27% 3-0 100.0%
    38 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 17-7 70.83% 14.42 50.92% 51.59% 16-7 69.57% 5-5 50.0%
    59 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 14-8 63.64% 13.95 53.66% 51.19% 14-6 70.00% 2-6 25.0%
    66 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 16-8 66.67% 13.71 50.52% 50.46% 16-8 66.67% 2-3 40.0%
    73 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 16-10 61.54% 13.50 52.67% 51.23% 16-10 61.54% 4-5 44.4%
    80 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 15-11 57.69% 13.23 53.61% 51.24% 15-11 57.69% 2-5 28.6%
    84 Walsh Midwest GMAC 15-7 68.18% 13.14 43.54% 49.82% 15-7 68.18% 1-2 33.3%
    87 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 15-9 62.50% 13.08 48.76% 50.19% 14-8 63.64% 1-4 20.0%
    88 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 15-10 60.00% 13.00 51.97% 49.32% 15-9 62.50% 2-6 25.0%
    95 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 14-8 63.64% 12.95 47.66% 50.50% 14-8 63.64% 1-4 20.0%
    104 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 14-10 58.33% 12.75 51.96% 49.14% 14-10 58.33% 1-5 16.7%
    109 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLIAC 12-11 52.17% 12.65 53.91% 50.28% 12-9 57.14% 3-4 42.9%
    110 Truman State Midwest GLVC 12-12 50.00% 12.63 56.83% 49.91% 12-12 50.00% 2-8 20.0%
    114 Drury Midwest GLVC 13-10 56.52% 12.43 49.85% 50.44% 13-6 68.42% 5-5 50.0%
    119 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 13-10 56.52% 12.30 48.78% 50.72% 13-10 56.52% 0-7 0.0%
    124 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 15-11 57.69% 12.19 44.46% 52.24% 15-11 57.69% 2-4 33.3%
    131 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 13-11 54.17% 12.08 48.39% 52.30% 11-11 50.00% 2-5 28.6%
    159 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 11-12 47.83% 11.48 49.49% 50.31% 10-12 45.45% 1-7 12.5%
    162 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 11-14 44.00% 11.36 49.96% 51.11% 10-14 41.67% 1-4 20.0%
    181 Malone Midwest GMAC 13-12 52.00% 11.08 46.32% 49.33% 13-12 52.00% 0-3 0.0%
    186 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 9-17 34.62% 10.92 57.50% 50.27% 8-16 33.33% 2-8 20.0%
    205 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 12-14 46.15% 10.58 45.21% 49.16% 12-14 46.15% 1-2 33.3%
    209 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 7-16 30.43% 10.48 58.69% 50.18% 7-16 30.43% 2-8 20.0%
    210 Salem Midwest IND 13-9 59.09% 10.45 33.01% 51.19% 12-9 57.14% 0-2 0.0%
    219 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 8-16 33.33% 10.17 52.82% 51.30% 8-16 33.33% 2-4 33.3%
    222 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 8-14 36.36% 10.09 51.96% 47.67% 8-14 36.36% 0-4 0.0%
    243 McKendree Midwest GLVC 6-16 27.27% 9.32 52.22% 49.87% 6-15 28.57% 1-7 12.5%
    254 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 7-17 29.17% 9.13 50.52% 51.14% 7-15 31.82% 1-5 16.7%
    256 Maryville Midwest GLVC 7-16 30.43% 9.09 47.33% 50.61% 7-16 30.43% 1-4 20.0%
    259 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 6-16 27.27% 9.00 52.69% 48.77% 6-16 27.27% 0-5 0.0%
    261 Quincy Midwest GLVC 5-17 22.73% 8.91 52.04% 50.36% 5-17 22.73% 0-7 0.0%
    263 Tiffin Midwest GMAC 7-18 28.00% 8.84 50.18% 49.48% 5-18 21.74% 0-6 0.0%
    266 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-5 0.00% 8.80 65.71% 45.94% 0-1 0.00% 0-4 0.0%
    275 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 4-20 16.67% 8.33 51.73% 50.51% 4-20 16.67% 0-6 0.0%
    277 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 6-20 23.08% 8.27 48.59% 48.06% 6-20 23.08% 0-3 0.0%
    285 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 4-17 19.05% 7.95 50.81% 48.27% 4-17 19.05% 0-3 0.0%
    294 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 3-18 14.29% 7.57 50.95% 50.12% 3-18 14.29% 0-8 0.0%

  8. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Amen.....

    Quote Originally Posted by Knightmoves View Post
    Really the point of the conference tournament is to determine a champion, not determine the auto bid. Personally, I think conference tournaments are a silly way to determine a champion or the recipient of an auto bid, but if you are going to let a team play in the regular season, you ought to let them play in the conference tournament. Davenport has kind of thrown a wrench in the who set up, good for them! Truth is that Davenport may help the GLIAC get another NCAA bid, because Ashland is in no matter who wins the GLIAC tournament.

  9. #89

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional% Ranked Record Ranked%
    6 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 21-3 87.50% 15.96 44.89% 51.85% 19-3 86.36% 3-2 60.0%
    12 Findlay Midwest GMAC 23-3 88.46% 15.62 45.55% 51.26% 23-3 88.46% 2-2 50.0%
    14 Lewis Midwest GLVC 20-4 83.33% 15.46 51.01% 51.47% 20-4 83.33% 9-2 81.8%
    15 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 22-4 84.62% 15.42 48.96% 52.18% 22-4 84.62% 7-4 63.6%
    25 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 18-5 78.26% 14.96 47.99% 51.76% 18-5 78.26% 3-0 100.0%
    37 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 19-7 73.08% 14.50 49.96% 51.52% 18-7 72.00% 5-6 45.5%
    55 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 16-8 66.67% 13.96 51.99% 51.51% 16-6 72.73% 3-6 33.3%
    79 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 16-11 59.26% 13.41 53.02% 50.87% 16-11 59.26% 4-5 44.4%
    80 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 16-11 59.26% 13.37 53.17% 51.08% 16-11 59.26% 3-5 37.5%
    81 Walsh Midwest GMAC 16-7 69.57% 13.35 44.19% 50.02% 16-7 69.57% 1-2 33.3%
    86 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 17-9 65.38% 13.23 48.98% 50.52% 17-9 65.38% 2-3 40.0%
    91 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 16-11 59.26% 13.07 52.56% 48.89% 16-10 61.54% 2-6 25.0%
    95 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 15-10 60.00% 12.92 50.78% 49.26% 15-10 60.00% 1-5 16.7%
    98 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 15-8 65.22% 12.87 46.51% 50.57% 15-8 65.22% 1-6 14.3%
    101 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLIAC 13-11 54.17% 12.71 52.09% 50.49% 13-9 59.09% 3-4 42.9%
    110 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 16-10 61.54% 12.58 47.56% 50.07% 15-9 62.50% 1-4 20.0%
    112 Drury Midwest GLVC 15-10 60.00% 12.48 49.47% 50.36% 15-6 71.43% 5-5 50.0%
    119 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 14-11 56.00% 12.32 48.96% 51.97% 12-11 52.17% 3-5 37.5%
    122 Truman State Midwest GLVC 12-14 46.15% 12.23 58.11% 49.89% 12-14 46.15% 2-11 15.4%
    134 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 15-12 55.56% 11.96 46.17% 51.87% 15-12 55.56% 2-4 33.3%
    136 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 14-11 56.00% 11.96 47.76% 50.94% 14-11 56.00% 1-8 11.1%
    171 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 11-15 42.31% 11.15 50.63% 51.10% 10-15 40.00% 1-6 14.3%
    177 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 10-17 37.04% 11.07 56.52% 50.49% 9-16 36.00% 2-8 20.0%
    181 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 11-14 44.00% 10.92 51.65% 50.14% 10-14 41.67% 2-9 18.2%
    187 Malone Midwest GMAC 13-13 50.00% 10.77 46.88% 49.54% 13-13 50.00% 0-3 0.0%
    199 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 13-15 46.43% 10.57 45.08% 49.33% 13-15 46.43% 1-2 33.3%
    212 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 9-15 37.50% 10.29 53.88% 47.58% 9-15 37.50% 1-5 16.7%
    215 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 7-17 29.17% 10.25 57.90% 50.43% 7-17 29.17% 2-8 20.0%
    220 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 8-17 32.00% 10.20 54.03% 51.04% 8-17 32.00% 2-5 28.6%
    222 Salem Midwest IND 13-9 59.09% 10.18 32.98% 51.02% 12-9 57.14% 0-2 0.0%
    249 Tiffin Midwest GMAC 9-18 33.33% 9.33 48.59% 49.42% 7-18 28.00% 0-6 0.0%
    253 McKendree Midwest GLVC 6-18 25.00% 9.04 53.97% 49.87% 6-17 26.09% 1-10 9.1%
    258 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 8-18 30.77% 8.92 49.27% 51.00% 8-16 33.33% 2-6 25.0%
    262 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 6-17 26.09% 8.87 53.15% 48.71% 6-17 26.09% 0-5 0.0%
    264 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-5 0.00% 8.80 66.63% 45.40% 0-1 0.00% 0-4 0.0%
    267 Maryville Midwest GLVC 7-17 29.17% 8.71 48.01% 50.49% 7-17 29.17% 1-7 12.5%
    271 Quincy Midwest GLVC 5-19 20.83% 8.42 53.64% 50.34% 5-19 20.83% 0-10 0.0%
    276 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 4-19 17.39% 8.22 53.38% 48.04% 4-19 17.39% 0-5 0.0%
    279 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 4-21 16.00% 8.20 51.96% 50.64% 4-21 16.00% 0-6 0.0%
    284 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 6-22 21.43% 8.00 48.70% 47.99% 6-22 21.43% 0-3 0.0%
    301 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 3-20 13.04% 7.04 50.46% 50.02% 3-20 13.04% 0-10 0.0%

  10. #90

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    One of our past conversations has been about "bracket creep" in the PIs (brackets being 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, and 75-100%). Some teams may experience this jump (up or down) during the tournaments. Probably isn't a significant factor at this point, but still can minorly affect seedings. Recall that each "bracket" results in a difference of 3 points averaged into the score.

    Two more wins to move up-
    USI (affects Hillsdale, Northern Michigan, LSSU, UMSL, Drury, Truman, Rockhurst, Bellarmine*2, Lewis*2, UIndy*2 )
    Truman (affects GVSU, Findlay, Cedarville, Southern Indiana, Bellarmine, UMSL, Drury, Rockhurst*2, UIndy*2, Lewis*2)

    One more loss to move down-
    Washburn (affects UIndy, Rockhurst, Truman)
    Missouri Southern (affects UMSL and Truman)
    Fairmont State (affects Ferris State)
    Last edited by schnautza; 03-07-2019 at 04:21 PM.

  11. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Quote Originally Posted by schnautza View Post
    One of our past conversations has been about "bracket creep" in the PIs (brackets being 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, and 75-100%). Some teams may experience this jump (up or down) during the tournaments. Probably isn't a significant factor at this point, but still can minorly affect seedings. Recall that each "bracket" results in a difference of 3 points averaged into the score.

    Two more wins to move up-
    USI (affects Hillsdale, Northern Michigan, LSSU, UMSL, Drury, Truman, Rockhurst, Bellarmine*2, Lewis*2, UIndy*2 )
    Truman (affects GVSU, Findlay, Cedarville, Southern Indiana, Bellarmine, UMSL, Drury, Rockhurst*2, UIndy*2, Lewis*2)

    One more loss to move down-
    Washburn (affects UIndy, Rockhurst, Truman)
    Missouri Southern (affects UMSL and Truman)
    Fairmont State (affects Ferris State)
    USI and Truman must win the conference tournament to end up 75% and 50%. 2 wins get them to each level but they must play a 3rd game, and if they lose that game they drop back down.

  12. #92

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Quote Originally Posted by WKYDave View Post
    USI and Truman must win the conference tournament to end up 75% and 50%. 2 wins get them to each level but they must play a 3rd game, and if they lose that game they drop back down.
    Good point, I hadn't thought that far ahead.

  13. #93

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    Our top 3 have switched places after last night. They are all sitting on a razor's edge. BU 15.56, Findlay 15.481, Lewis 15.480
    Looks like the next couple of GLVC games will determine a lot. Both have championship hosting on the line. And neither one has an easy game on Saturday either.

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional% Ranked Record Ranked%
    9 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 22-3 88.00% 15.92 44.36% 52.10% 20-3 86.96% 3-2 60.0%
    12 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 23-4 85.19% 15.56 48.93% 52.08% 23-4 85.19% 7-4 63.6%
    13 Findlay Midwest GMAC 24-3 88.89% 15.48 45.28% 51.12% 24-3 88.89% 2-2 50.0%
    14 Lewis Midwest GLVC 21-4 84.00% 15.48 50.32% 51.91% 21-4 84.00% 9-2 81.8%
    37 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 18-6 75.00% 14.58 48.35% 51.52% 18-6 75.00% 3-0 100.0%
    38 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 20-7 74.07% 14.56 50.01% 51.52% 19-7 73.08% 6-6 50.0%
    65 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 16-9 64.00% 13.68 52.38% 51.48% 16-7 69.57% 3-7 30.0%
    69 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 17-11 60.71% 13.61 53.10% 51.08% 17-11 60.71% 4-5 44.4%
    81 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 18-9 66.67% 13.30 49.09% 50.57% 18-9 66.67% 2-3 40.0%
    86 Walsh Midwest GMAC 17-7 70.83% 13.17 43.81% 50.11% 17-7 70.83% 1-2 33.3%
    87 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 16-12 57.14% 13.14 53.13% 50.88% 16-12 57.14% 4-6 40.0%
    95 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLIAC 14-11 56.00% 12.92 51.56% 50.43% 14-9 60.87% 3-4 42.9%
    104 Drury Midwest GLVC 16-10 61.54% 12.73 49.91% 50.54% 16-6 72.73% 6-6 50.0%
    107 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 16-12 57.14% 12.68 52.97% 48.85% 16-11 59.26% 2-7 22.2%
    108 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 17-10 62.96% 12.67 47.50% 50.21% 16-9 64.00% 1-4 20.0%
    111 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 15-9 62.50% 12.63 47.67% 50.48% 15-9 62.50% 1-7 12.5%
    114 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 15-11 57.69% 12.50 51.11% 49.23% 15-11 57.69% 1-5 16.7%
    121 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 16-12 57.14% 12.36 46.75% 51.69% 16-12 57.14% 3-4 42.9%
    124 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 14-12 53.85% 12.15 49.02% 51.90% 12-12 50.00% 3-5 37.5%
    125 Truman State Midwest GLVC 12-15 44.44% 12.15 58.98% 49.90% 12-15 44.44% 3-12 20.0%
    137 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 14-12 53.85% 11.88 49.21% 50.83% 14-12 53.85% 1-9 10.0%
    154 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 11-17 39.29% 11.50 57.16% 50.17% 10-16 38.46% 2-8 20.0%
    185 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 11-14 44.00% 10.80 51.37% 50.22% 10-14 41.67% 2-9 18.2%
    191 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 10-16 38.46% 10.69 50.49% 51.11% 9-16 36.00% 1-6 14.3%
    192 Malone Midwest GMAC 13-14 48.15% 10.67 47.57% 49.33% 13-14 48.15% 0-3 0.0%
    206 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 13-16 44.83% 10.38 46.36% 49.16% 13-16 44.83% 1-3 25.0%
    212 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 7-17 29.17% 10.25 57.50% 50.45% 7-17 29.17% 2-8 20.0%
    217 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 8-17 32.00% 10.20 53.69% 51.01% 8-17 32.00% 2-5 28.6%
    222 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 9-15 37.50% 10.04 53.69% 47.67% 9-15 37.50% 1-5 16.7%
    249 Tiffin Midwest GMAC 9-18 33.33% 9.22 48.36% 49.49% 7-18 28.00% 0-6 0.0%
    255 McKendree Midwest GLVC 6-18 25.00% 9.04 53.58% 50.05% 6-17 26.09% 1-10 9.1%
    259 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 8-18 30.77% 8.92 49.11% 51.06% 8-16 33.33% 2-6 25.0%
    263 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-5 0.00% 8.80 67.29% 45.50% 0-1 0.00% 0-4 0.0%
    266 Maryville Midwest GLVC 7-17 29.17% 8.71 47.78% 50.53% 7-17 29.17% 1-7 12.5%
    270 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 6-17 26.09% 8.61 52.71% 48.80% 6-17 26.09% 0-5 0.0%
    273 Quincy Midwest GLVC 5-19 20.83% 8.42 53.31% 50.51% 5-19 20.83% 0-10 0.0%
    275 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 4-21 16.00% 8.20 51.48% 50.65% 4-21 16.00% 0-6 0.0%
    289 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 4-19 17.39% 7.83 53.21% 48.14% 4-19 17.39% 0-5 0.0%
    291 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 6-22 21.43% 7.79 48.45% 48.06% 6-22 21.43% 0-3 0.0%
    300 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 3-20 13.04% 7.04 50.01% 50.24% 3-20 13.04% 0-10 0.0%

  14. #94

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    The PI's among the top three are so close as to be meaningless.

    I would say that both GLVC semi-finals are 50/50 propositions.

    I have to believe that if Drury beats Lewis, they will be in the tournament, ignoring an auto bid thief. That is a lot to ignore, however, because right now Parkside or GVSU has better than a 50/50 chance of being an auto bid thief. NMU, however, is quite capable of beating Davenport. One thing I am not sure of is how strong the Davenport home court advantage is. This certainly is a bizarre situation. If NMU beats Davenport in the semis and losses in the final, at least the winner will have substantially earned its bid. As far as my team is concerned, I would prefer to see Davenport win on Saturday, because Drury is playing as well as anyone in the region and would be a #8 seed quite capable of winning the regional. My sense of justice and fair play, however, does not want to see GVSU or Parkside get a bid they do not deserve. Of course, Drury can solve their problem by winning the GLVC tourney. BTW, if they do, they should be better than an 8 seed regardless of who else qualifies.

    If Lewis losses to Drury, it could be a repeat of 2015 when Drury beat BU in the conf. finals and then had to play BU in the first round of the NCAA.

    I haven't even mentioned the possibility of Findlay lossing in the GMAC tourney.

  15. #95

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2018-19

    For comparison's sake, here are the final PI numbers after conference tourneys.

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional% Ranked Record Ranked%
    9 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 25-4 86.21% 15.79 49.53% 51.93% 25-4 86.21% 9-4 69.2%
    12 Davenport Midwest GLIAC 23-4 85.19% 15.63 45.36% 51.84% 21-4 84.00% 4-2 66.7%
    16 Findlay Midwest GMAC 25-4 86.21% 15.24 46.42% 50.71% 25-4 86.21% 2-2 50.0%
    19 Lewis Midwest GLVC 21-5 80.77% 15.15 50.37% 51.83% 21-5 80.77% 9-3 75.0%
    34 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 18-6 75.00% 14.58 48.21% 51.45% 18-6 75.00% 3-0 100.0%
    39 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 20-8 71.43% 14.39 50.87% 51.29% 19-8 70.37% 6-7 46.2%
    59 Walsh Midwest GMAC 19-7 73.08% 13.77 45.94% 49.74% 19-7 73.08% 3-2 60.0%
    61 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 16-9 64.00% 13.68 51.95% 51.64% 16-7 69.57% 3-7 30.0%
    68 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 17-12 58.62% 13.52 53.81% 50.81% 17-12 58.62% 4-5 44.4%
    84 Hillsdale Midwest GMAC 18-10 64.29% 13.07 49.43% 50.40% 18-10 64.29% 2-3 40.0%
    90 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 16-12 57.14% 13.04 52.40% 50.93% 16-12 57.14% 4-6 40.0%
    93 Drury Midwest GLVC 17-11 60.71% 12.96 51.86% 50.42% 17-7 70.83% 7-7 50.0%
    94 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 18-12 60.00% 12.93 47.80% 51.31% 18-12 60.00% 3-4 42.9%
    104 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLIAC 14-12 53.85% 12.69 51.61% 50.33% 14-10 58.33% 3-4 42.9%
    105 Lake Erie Midwest GMAC 16-12 57.14% 12.68 52.45% 49.13% 16-11 59.26% 2-7 22.2%
    108 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 17-11 60.71% 12.61 48.66% 49.99% 16-10 61.54% 1-5 16.7%
    111 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 15-9 62.50% 12.50 47.26% 50.55% 15-9 62.50% 1-7 12.5%
    111 Ohio Dominican Midwest GMAC 15-11 57.69% 12.50 50.50% 49.44% 15-11 57.69% 1-5 16.7%
    123 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 14-12 53.85% 12.15 48.42% 51.84% 12-12 50.00% 3-5 37.5%
    126 Truman State Midwest GLVC 12-15 44.44% 12.04 58.28% 50.02% 12-15 44.44% 3-12 20.0%
    134 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 14-12 53.85% 11.88 48.70% 50.93% 14-12 53.85% 1-9 10.0%
    149 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 11-17 39.29% 11.50 56.74% 50.29% 10-16 38.46% 2-8 20.0%
    179 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 11-14 44.00% 10.80 50.98% 50.20% 10-14 41.67% 2-9 18.2%
    184 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 10-16 38.46% 10.69 50.04% 51.09% 9-16 36.00% 1-6 14.3%
    186 Malone Midwest GMAC 13-14 48.15% 10.67 47.31% 49.47% 13-14 48.15% 0-3 0.0%
    201 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 13-16 44.83% 10.38 46.19% 49.21% 13-16 44.83% 1-3 25.0%
    206 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 7-17 29.17% 10.25 57.07% 50.51% 7-17 29.17% 2-8 20.0%
    208 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 8-17 32.00% 10.20 53.35% 50.95% 8-17 32.00% 2-5 28.6%
    218 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 9-15 37.50% 10.04 53.31% 47.87% 9-15 37.50% 1-5 16.7%
    245 Tiffin Midwest GMAC 9-18 33.33% 9.22 47.93% 49.55% 7-18 28.00% 0-6 0.0%
    251 McKendree Midwest GLVC 6-18 25.00% 9.04 53.19% 50.14% 6-17 26.09% 1-10 9.1%
    255 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 8-18 30.77% 8.92 48.54% 51.06% 8-16 33.33% 2-6 25.0%
    262 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-5 0.00% 8.80 65.47% 46.39% 0-1 0.00% 0-4 0.0%
    264 Maryville Midwest GLVC 7-17 29.17% 8.71 47.65% 50.63% 7-17 29.17% 1-7 12.5%
    268 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 6-17 26.09% 8.61 52.25% 48.94% 6-17 26.09% 0-5 0.0%
    272 Quincy Midwest GLVC 5-19 20.83% 8.42 52.83% 50.58% 5-19 20.83% 0-10 0.0%
    275 Purdue Northwest Midwest GLIAC 4-21 16.00% 8.20 51.14% 50.56% 4-21 16.00% 0-6 0.0%
    285 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 4-19 17.39% 7.83 52.69% 48.40% 4-19 17.39% 0-5 0.0%
    286 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 6-22 21.43% 7.79 48.28% 48.11% 6-22 21.43% 0-3 0.0%
    299 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 3-20 13.04% 7.04 49.58% 50.24% 3-20 13.04% 0-10 0.0%

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •