Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 87

Thread: Performance Indicators 2016-17

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Evansville, IN
    Posts
    4,177
    Contribute to D2
    Rep Power
    55450

    Default Performance Indicators 2016-17

    I had a request to start this thread over here in the West forum - so here are the current performance indicators - see the Midwest forum's thread for more info on what they mean if you aren't familiar with them. If you see any errors or omissions, please let me know. My source has been known to misreport some scores. Note that only games against NCAA D2 competition are recorded.

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W%
    8 California Baptist West PWC 12-1 92.31% 16.38 54.37% 50.73%
    9 Chico State West CCAA 11-1 91.67% 16.33 50.17% 50.69%
    10 UC San Diego West CCAA 12-2 85.71% 16.21 53.95% 51.54%
    18 San Francisco State West CCAA 12-1 92.31% 15.62 40.50% 51.98%
    29 Western Washington West GNAC 10-3 76.92% 15.23 53.44% 49.52%
    32 Hawai'i Pacific West PWC 9-1 90.00% 15.10 40.70% 50.53%
    48 Chaminade West PWC 9-3 75.00% 14.33 47.58% 49.21%
    61 Dixie State West PWC 10-4 71.43% 14.00 48.98% 52.70%
    74 Central Washington West GNAC 7-3 70.00% 13.70 48.16% 50.85%
    76 Cal State San Marcos West CCAA 7-4 63.64% 13.55 53.38% 51.82%
    76 Alaska Anchorage West GNAC 7-4 63.64% 13.55 50.60% 49.60%
    78 Sonoma State West CCAA 9-4 69.23% 13.54 50.38% 50.69%
    93 Concordia (Calif.) West PWC 8-5 61.54% 13.08 51.37% 50.76%
    118 Cal State Dominguez Hills West CCAA 6-4 60.00% 12.40 44.05% 52.56%
    126 Montana State Billings West GNAC 8-4 66.67% 12.33 39.60% 52.60%
    129 Western Oregon West GNAC 7-6 53.85% 12.31 54.12% 50.08%
    142 Azusa Pacific West PWC 7-9 43.75% 11.88 56.64% 50.82%
    144 Cal State East Bay West CCAA 9-6 60.00% 11.87 45.14% 51.77%
    146 Point Loma West PWC 8-6 57.14% 11.86 43.15% 51.04%
    148 Saint Martin's West GNAC 6-5 54.55% 11.82 45.58% 51.66%
    150 Cal State San Bernardino West CCAA 5-5 50.00% 11.70 49.71% 52.41%
    157 Westminster West RMAC 5-6 45.45% 11.55 54.77% 46.91%
    159 Seattle Pacific West GNAC 7-7 50.00% 11.50 50.47% 51.49%
    179 Humboldt State West CCAA 5-6 45.45% 11.27 50.30% 49.26%
    205 Cal State LA West CCAA 6-8 42.86% 10.64 51.47% 49.96%
    211 Hawai'i Hilo West PWC 4-7 36.36% 10.36 50.99% 50.09%
    214 Concordia (Ore.) West GNAC 3-7 30.00% 10.30 56.67% 49.28%
    216 Academy of Art West PWC 4-8 33.33% 10.25 51.06% 47.76%
    225 Alaska West GNAC 5-9 35.71% 10.07 47.62% 49.53%
    236 Northwest Nazarene West GNAC 2-7 22.22% 9.56 60.33% 48.47%
    237 Cal Poly Pomona West CCAA 2-9 18.18% 9.55 66.48% 49.87%
    252 Dominican (Calif.) West PWC 4-10 28.57% 9.00 48.65% 47.23%
    265 Stanislaus State West CCAA 4-10 28.57% 8.57 48.35% 49.18%
    273 Simon Fraser West GNAC 2-12 14.29% 8.29 59.28% 48.39%
    276 Cal State Monterey Bay West CCAA 3-11 21.43% 8.14 50.35% 50.07%
    282 Notre Dame de Namur West PWC 2-9 18.18% 7.91 52.67% 47.35%
    287 Fresno Pacific West PWC 2-12 14.29% 7.79 52.29% 49.15%
    289 BYU-Hawaii West PWC 3-9 25.00% 7.67 41.01% 50.20%
    303 Holy Names West PWC 1-14 6.67% 6.73 50.34% 46.54%

  2. #2

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Can you break down what this means?

  3. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Sull,


    The Performance Indicator is one of the primary pieces of criteria the selection committee uses at the end of the year. Typically the PI's aren't released until the regional rankings start to come out from the committee, however, typically in past years the teams that have finished in the Top 8 in PI have made the regional. The seeding always varies within those 8 depending on how the committee breaks down the other criteria. But basically each game is assigned a point value like if cwu won AT wwu and WWU was a team with a .750 or higher winning percentage that would be assigned maybe 21 points whereas beating a bad team at home is assigned only a few...you then add up al the points you accumulated divided by the games played and you end up with your performance indicator. Its basically a standardized way to determine who the best teams are.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Every game you play (against D2 competition) is assigned a point value based solely on three things: (1) W/L, (2) home/road/neutral, and (3) win% of opponent.

    These values range from 0 to 23 and are averaged for a final score. They are constantly changing through the season, so if a team you beat was 50% but then loses a game later on to drop below 50%, your points drop accordingly within your average.

    http://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-...rney-selection

  5. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Thank you! This is great info. The two Hawaii schools are too high for my liking, but that happens when you never leave the islands. I'm sure they'll come back to reality at some point.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W%
    7 California Baptist West PWC 13-1 92.86% 16.64 53.97% 50.89%
    8 Chico State West CCAA 11-1 91.67% 16.58 50.91% 50.39%
    10 UC San Diego West CCAA 12-2 85.71% 16.21 53.99% 51.41%
    19 San Francisco State West CCAA 12-1 92.31% 15.62 40.17% 52.32%
    27 Western Washington West GNAC 11-3 78.57% 15.14 50.72% 50.72%
    29 Hawai'i Pacific West PWC 10-1 90.91% 15.00 37.55% 51.05%
    57 Central Washington West GNAC 8-3 72.73% 14.09 48.71% 51.01%
    58 Chaminade West PWC 10-3 76.92% 14.08 44.39% 49.75%
    66 Dixie State West PWC 11-4 73.33% 13.87 47.17% 53.12%
    73 Sonoma State West CCAA 9-4 69.23% 13.54 50.07% 50.46%
    78 Cal State San Marcos West CCAA 8-4 66.67% 13.42 50.03% 53.32%
    80 Concordia (Calif.) West PWC 8-5 61.54% 13.31 51.81% 50.10%
    90 Alaska Anchorage West GNAC 7-5 58.33% 13.08 52.66% 47.99%
    92 Montana State Billings West GNAC 9-4 69.23% 13.00 41.99% 52.42%
    122 Cal State Dominguez Hills West CCAA 6-4 60.00% 12.40 44.07% 52.25%
    124 Western Oregon West GNAC 8-6 57.14% 12.29 51.26% 51.22%
    135 Cal State East Bay West CCAA 9-6 60.00% 12.07 45.88% 51.72%
    150 Cal State San Bernardino West CCAA 5-5 50.00% 11.70 49.40% 52.32%
    153 Point Loma West PWC 8-6 57.14% 11.64 42.73% 51.16%
    158 Westminster West RMAC 5-6 45.45% 11.55 55.07% 46.79%
    160 Azusa Pacific West PWC 7-10 41.18% 11.53 59.10% 50.39%
    172 Seattle Pacific West GNAC 7-8 46.67% 11.27 51.77% 50.81%
    176 Saint Martin's West GNAC 6-6 50.00% 11.25 43.87% 52.23%
    182 Humboldt State West CCAA 5-6 45.45% 11.00 50.01% 49.20%
    197 Cal State LA West CCAA 6-8 42.86% 10.64 50.95% 50.25%
    207 Northwest Nazarene West GNAC 3-7 30.00% 10.40 59.35% 48.67%
    216 Academy of Art West PWC 4-8 33.33% 10.25 51.14% 47.67%
    221 Concordia (Ore.) West GNAC 3-8 27.27% 10.18 59.44% 49.23%
    224 Alaska West GNAC 5-9 35.71% 10.07 47.61% 48.95%
    230 Hawai'i Hilo West PWC 4-7 36.36% 9.82 49.77% 49.88%
    243 Cal Poly Pomona West CCAA 2-10 16.67% 9.42 66.73% 49.57%
    250 Dominican (Calif.) West PWC 4-11 26.67% 8.93 50.38% 46.79%
    264 Stanislaus State West CCAA 4-10 28.57% 8.57 48.03% 49.64%
    275 Cal State Monterey Bay West CCAA 3-11 21.43% 8.14 50.32% 50.35%
    278 Notre Dame de Namur West PWC 2-10 16.67% 8.00 55.01% 46.50%
    285 Simon Fraser West GNAC 2-13 13.33% 7.87 58.66% 48.71%
    285 Fresno Pacific West PWC 2-13 13.33% 7.87 55.05% 47.72%
    288 BYU-Hawaii West PWC 3-9 25.00% 7.67 40.30% 50.46%
    302 Holy Names West PWC 1-14 6.67% 6.73 50.32% 46.68%

  7. #7

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W%
    7 Chico State West CCAA 13-1 92.86% 16.36 49.15% 51.24%
    9 California Baptist West PWC 14-1 93.33% 16.33 53.65% 51.28%
    12 UC San Diego West CCAA 13-3 81.25% 15.94 56.76% 51.07%
    19 Western Washington West GNAC 12-3 80.00% 15.27 51.71% 50.97%
    24 San Francisco State West CCAA 13-2 86.67% 15.13 43.68% 51.96%
    30 Hawai'i Pacific West PWC 11-1 91.67% 14.92 40.02% 49.41%
    51 Sonoma State West CCAA 11-4 73.33% 14.13 51.43% 51.08%
    57 Central Washington West GNAC 9-3 75.00% 13.92 47.60% 50.86%
    72 Dixie State West PWC 11-5 68.75% 13.69 47.72% 52.50%
    78 Montana State Billings West GNAC 10-4 71.43% 13.36 42.94% 52.35%
    80 Cal State San Marcos West CCAA 9-4 69.23% 13.31 47.87% 53.68%
    89 Chaminade West PWC 10-4 71.43% 13.00 42.09% 49.55%
    112 Westminster West RMAC 7-6 53.85% 12.62 54.54% 47.48%
    114 Alaska Anchorage West GNAC 7-5 58.33% 12.58 52.37% 48.39%
    116 Concordia (Calif.) West PWC 8-6 57.14% 12.50 55.18% 49.82%
    126 Western Oregon West GNAC 8-7 53.33% 12.27 54.15% 51.30%
    133 Cal State East Bay West CCAA 10-6 62.50% 12.06 44.86% 51.80%
    141 Point Loma West PWC 9-6 60.00% 11.87 44.25% 51.84%
    148 Cal State Dominguez Hills West CCAA 6-6 50.00% 11.67 47.50% 51.06%
    151 Azusa Pacific West PWC 8-10 44.44% 11.56 57.31% 50.52%
    166 Cal State San Bernardino West CCAA 5-7 41.67% 11.33 54.71% 50.93%
    179 Cal State LA West CCAA 7-9 43.75% 11.06 51.84% 50.62%
    180 Saint Martin's West GNAC 6-7 46.15% 11.00 47.51% 51.96%
    183 Seattle Pacific West GNAC 7-9 43.75% 10.88 51.03% 50.20%
    187 Northwest Nazarene West GNAC 4-7 36.36% 10.82 58.07% 48.56%
    189 Humboldt State West CCAA 5-7 41.67% 10.75 50.56% 49.15%
    215 Concordia (Ore.) West GNAC 4-8 33.33% 10.08 54.01% 51.37%
    237 Hawai'i Hilo West PWC 5-7 41.67% 9.42 45.48% 48.93%
    240 Alaska West GNAC 5-10 33.33% 9.33 49.27% 48.92%
    245 Cal Poly Pomona West CCAA 2-10 16.67% 9.17 65.35% 50.43%
    246 Academy of Art West PWC 4-9 30.77% 9.15 50.17% 48.85%
    260 Stanislaus State West CCAA 5-11 31.25% 8.63 45.85% 50.57%
    263 Dominican (Calif.) West PWC 4-12 25.00% 8.56 51.83% 46.20%
    273 Fresno Pacific West PWC 3-13 18.75% 8.31 55.99% 48.17%
    279 Cal State Monterey Bay West CCAA 3-12 20.00% 8.13 51.83% 49.49%
    285 Simon Fraser West GNAC 2-14 12.50% 7.88 56.43% 49.40%
    292 BYU-Hawaii West PWC 3-10 23.08% 7.31 42.18% 48.80%
    301 Holy Names West PWC 2-14 12.50% 6.88 48.18% 47.80%
    302 Notre Dame de Namur West PWC 2-11 15.38% 6.85 50.49% 46.54%

  8. #8

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    I think the performance indicator system is flawed to the extent it does not take into account the competitiveness in the wins and loses of the respective teams (a 2 point OT win is seem the same as a 35 point win). This was apparent in the selection of the women's basketball regional host last year. UAA blew out many of the common opponents that ASU had struggled with, and I think was clearly the better team (as proven by winning the regional). It also does not take into account the relative strength of the conferences. This is not currently an issue in the west region so much, but it wasn't that long ago that there were a lot of marginal teams and it didn't take much of a team to finish with a .500 plus record in the Pac West. While I would agree that it is a system that is fair to the extent that all the teams are playing by the same rules, it is a very blunt instrument when it comes to determining the relative quality of the teams. I suppose it is now the job of a good coach and AD to take PI into account when scheduling, to give your team the highest possible PI with the least risk.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by Rob_AK View Post
    I think the performance indicator system is flawed to the extent it does not take into account the competitiveness in the wins and loses of the respective teams (a 2 point OT win is seem the same as a 35 point win). This was apparent in the selection of the women's basketball regional host last year. UAA blew out many of the common opponents that ASU had struggled with, and I think was clearly the better team (as proven by winning the regional). It also does not take into account the relative strength of the conferences. This is not currently an issue in the west region so much, but it wasn't that long ago that there were a lot of marginal teams and it didn't take much of a team to finish with a .500 plus record in the Pac West. While I would agree that it is a system that is fair to the extent that all the teams are playing by the same rules, it is a very blunt instrument when it comes to determining the relative quality of the teams. I suppose it is now the job of a good coach and AD to take PI into account when scheduling, to give your team the highest possible PI with the least risk.
    Remember that this isn't THE selection criteria, but is one of multiple criteria that they selection committee may use. I've found (based on observation) that this formula generally narrows down to the top 8-10 teams but then those within the region may shift a few teams around with the considerations that you've listed. Auto-bids also throw a wrench in the system.

    As we near the end of the season, I'll also add a column for wins against regionally ranked opponents - this is usually where you can see the "tiebreakers" come into play and the picture becomes more complete.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W%
    6 Chico State West CCAA 13-1 92.86% 16.36 48.65% 51.56%
    7 California Baptist West PWC 15-1 93.75% 16.25 52.13% 51.30%
    10 UC San Diego West CCAA 13-3 81.25% 15.94 56.79% 51.01%
    18 Western Washington West GNAC 12-3 80.00% 15.47 51.80% 50.85%
    32 Hawai'i Pacific West PWC 12-1 92.31% 14.85 38.29% 49.33%
    40 San Francisco State West CCAA 13-3 81.25% 14.50 43.91% 52.51%
    45 Sonoma State West CCAA 11-4 73.33% 14.33 51.53% 51.45%
    48 Central Washington West GNAC 9-3 75.00% 14.17 48.23% 50.91%
    52 Dixie State West PWC 12-5 70.59% 14.06 47.17% 53.24%
    77 Montana State Billings West GNAC 10-4 71.43% 13.36 42.97% 52.09%
    81 Cal State San Marcos West CCAA 9-4 69.23% 13.31 48.18% 53.58%
    92 Chaminade West PWC 10-4 71.43% 13.00 41.40% 49.94%
    100 Alaska Anchorage West GNAC 7-5 58.33% 12.83 52.53% 48.12%
    112 Westminster West RMAC 7-6 53.85% 12.62 54.33% 47.88%
    118 Western Oregon West GNAC 8-7 53.33% 12.47 53.94% 51.24%
    126 Cal State San Bernardino West CCAA 6-7 46.15% 12.31 56.46% 50.69%
    133 Concordia (Calif.) West PWC 8-7 53.33% 12.07 56.31% 49.33%
    134 Cal State East Bay West CCAA 10-6 62.50% 12.06 44.32% 52.08%
    140 Azusa Pacific West PWC 9-10 47.37% 11.89 56.97% 50.15%
    149 Cal State Dominguez Hills West CCAA 6-6 50.00% 11.67 47.54% 50.66%
    150 Point Loma West PWC 9-7 56.25% 11.63 44.54% 51.80%
    171 Saint Martin's West GNAC 7-7 50.00% 11.29 47.11% 52.03%
    176 Northwest Nazarene West GNAC 4-7 36.36% 11.09 57.82% 48.68%
    180 Cal State LA West CCAA 7-9 43.75% 11.06 51.22% 50.63%
    190 Humboldt State West CCAA 5-7 41.67% 10.75 49.90% 49.00%
    193 Seattle Pacific West GNAC 7-10 41.18% 10.71 51.03% 49.90%
    200 Concordia (Ore.) West GNAC 4-8 33.33% 10.33 54.04% 51.51%
    227 Hawai'i Hilo West PWC 5-7 41.67% 9.67 45.26% 48.86%
    229 Alaska West GNAC 5-10 33.33% 9.53 49.40% 48.62%
    240 Academy of Art West PWC 4-10 28.57% 9.29 53.56% 48.88%
    244 Cal Poly Pomona West CCAA 2-10 16.67% 9.17 65.70% 50.37%
    261 Stanislaus State West CCAA 5-11 31.25% 8.63 45.59% 50.87%
    264 Dominican (Calif.) West PWC 4-12 25.00% 8.56 51.25% 46.16%
    266 Fresno Pacific West PWC 3-13 18.75% 8.50 55.57% 48.04%
    279 Cal State Monterey Bay West CCAA 3-12 20.00% 8.13 51.81% 49.64%
    282 Simon Fraser West GNAC 2-14 12.50% 8.06 56.29% 49.33%
    293 BYU-Hawaii West PWC 3-10 23.08% 7.31 41.91% 49.08%
    300 Notre Dame de Namur West PWC 2-12 14.29% 7.00 53.35% 45.60%
    302 Holy Names West PWC 2-14 12.50% 6.88 47.39% 47.99%

  11. #11

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W%
    5 California Baptist West PWC 16-1 94.12% 16.65 50.54% 51.62%
    11 Chico State West CCAA 14-2 87.50% 16.06 46.42% 52.41%
    13 UC San Diego West CCAA 13-4 76.47% 15.71 57.30% 51.01%
    16 Western Washington West GNAC 14-3 82.35% 15.59 51.24% 51.42%
    20 San Francisco State West CCAA 14-3 82.35% 15.41 45.88% 52.13%
    28 Hawai'i Pacific West PWC 13-1 92.86% 15.21 39.85% 49.42%
    39 Sonoma State West CCAA 11-5 68.75% 14.69 55.06% 50.29%
    46 Cal State San Marcos West CCAA 10-5 66.67% 14.40 51.11% 53.74%
    53 Central Washington West GNAC 10-4 71.43% 14.14 48.31% 51.17%
    54 Dixie State West PWC 13-5 72.22% 14.11 47.72% 53.29%
    76 Alaska Anchorage West GNAC 9-5 64.29% 13.57 51.66% 48.91%
    83 Chaminade West PWC 11-4 73.33% 13.33 41.72% 49.28%
    91 Concordia (Calif.) West PWC 9-7 56.25% 13.13 55.95% 49.72%
    109 Westminster West RMAC 9-6 60.00% 12.73 50.58% 49.64%
    110 Cal State San Bernardino West CCAA 7-7 50.00% 12.71 56.33% 50.85%
    113 Cal State East Bay West CCAA 11-7 61.11% 12.61 45.06% 51.40%
    125 Montana State Billings West GNAC 10-6 62.50% 12.31 44.38% 51.18%
    126 Western Oregon West GNAC 9-8 52.94% 12.29 53.19% 51.12%
    132 Azusa Pacific West PWC 9-11 45.00% 12.15 58.22% 49.99%
    155 Saint Martin's West GNAC 8-7 53.33% 11.73 48.16% 51.61%
    157 Cal State Dominguez Hills West CCAA 7-7 50.00% 11.71 47.30% 49.77%
    161 Cal State LA West CCAA 9-9 50.00% 11.67 50.30% 50.77%
    168 Point Loma West PWC 9-8 52.94% 11.47 47.00% 51.62%
    178 Northwest Nazarene West GNAC 5-8 38.46% 11.08 55.08% 49.29%
    182 Seattle Pacific West GNAC 8-10 44.44% 10.94 50.78% 50.12%
    187 Cal Poly Pomona West CCAA 4-10 28.57% 10.86 64.59% 50.46%
    207 Humboldt State West CCAA 5-9 35.71% 10.29 51.39% 48.58%
    210 Alaska West GNAC 6-11 35.29% 10.18 50.15% 49.07%
    229 Concordia (Ore.) West GNAC 4-10 28.57% 9.79 53.04% 51.29%
    244 Dominican (Calif.) West PWC 5-13 27.78% 9.22 51.82% 46.70%
    244 Stanislaus State West CCAA 6-12 33.33% 9.22 44.14% 51.29%
    247 Hawai'i Hilo West PWC 5-9 35.71% 9.14 48.34% 48.06%
    253 Fresno Pacific West PWC 4-13 23.53% 9.00 54.32% 48.13%
    260 Academy of Art West PWC 4-12 25.00% 8.81 50.56% 49.24%
    280 Cal State Monterey Bay West CCAA 3-14 17.65% 8.12 50.40% 49.72%
    290 BYU-Hawaii West PWC 4-11 26.67% 7.67 43.30% 48.48%
    296 Holy Names West PWC 3-15 16.67% 7.50 45.40% 47.90%
    297 Simon Fraser West GNAC 2-16 11.11% 7.33 55.19% 49.77%
    299 Notre Dame de Namur West PWC 3-13 18.75% 7.25 50.16% 47.06%

  12. #12

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W%
    9 California Baptist West PWC 18-1 94.74% 16.11 47.19% 51.58%
    11 Chico State West CCAA 16-2 88.89% 15.94 49.38% 52.46%
    18 UC San Diego West CCAA 14-5 73.68% 15.53 57.93% 50.61%
    20 San Francisco State West CCAA 15-3 83.33% 15.33 48.00% 52.09%
    21 Western Washington West GNAC 16-3 84.21% 15.32 49.16% 51.12%
    24 Hawai'i Pacific West PWC 14-1 93.33% 15.20 38.21% 50.07%
    33 Sonoma State West CCAA 13-5 72.22% 14.78 54.93% 50.68%
    57 Dixie State West PWC 14-5 73.68% 14.00 47.84% 52.48%
    71 Alaska Anchorage West GNAC 11-5 68.75% 13.63 50.26% 49.06%
    80 Concordia (Calif.) West PWC 11-7 61.11% 13.33 54.67% 49.94%
    83 Cal State San Marcos West CCAA 10-7 58.82% 13.24 55.73% 52.18%
    98 Chaminade West PWC 12-5 70.59% 12.94 41.80% 49.54%
    103 Central Washington West GNAC 10-6 62.50% 12.75 48.59% 50.80%
    104 Western Oregon West GNAC 11-8 57.89% 12.63 52.79% 50.94%
    109 Cal State San Bernardino West CCAA 8-8 50.00% 12.50 55.62% 51.28%
    131 Montana State Billings West GNAC 11-7 61.11% 12.11 44.91% 50.64%
    160 Cal State LA West CCAA 9-10 47.37% 11.47 50.65% 50.38%
    162 Azusa Pacific West PWC 9-12 42.86% 11.43 57.13% 49.78%
    166 Cal Poly Pomona West CCAA 6-10 37.50% 11.25 59.39% 50.89%
    171 Cal State East Bay West CCAA 11-9 55.00% 11.20 44.88% 51.20%
    174 Cal State Dominguez Hills West CCAA 8-8 50.00% 11.19 48.45% 50.38%
    176 Point Loma West PWC 10-8 55.56% 11.17 46.21% 50.98%
    182 Humboldt State West CCAA 7-9 43.75% 10.94 47.67% 49.98%
    186 Saint Martin's West GNAC 8-9 47.06% 10.88 49.07% 51.03%
    188 Northwest Nazarene West GNAC 6-9 40.00% 10.80 52.84% 50.15%
    191 Seattle Pacific West GNAC 9-11 45.00% 10.75 51.25% 49.60%
    226 Alaska West GNAC 7-12 36.84% 9.79 48.87% 49.33%
    230 Concordia (Ore.) West GNAC 5-11 31.25% 9.75 52.42% 51.03%
    240 Dominican (Calif.) West PWC 6-14 30.00% 9.55 52.42% 47.59%
    255 Academy of Art West PWC 5-13 27.78% 8.94 48.86% 49.78%
    260 Hawai'i Hilo West PWC 5-10 33.33% 8.87 49.68% 48.32%
    265 Stanislaus State West CCAA 6-14 30.00% 8.60 47.27% 51.53%
    279 Fresno Pacific West PWC 4-16 20.00% 8.15 53.54% 47.58%
    285 BYU-Hawaii West PWC 4-12 25.00% 7.88 46.75% 48.14%
    288 Holy Names West PWC 4-16 20.00% 7.75 44.80% 48.23%
    294 Notre Dame de Namur West PWC 3-14 17.65% 7.47 52.30% 47.32%
    295 Simon Fraser West GNAC 2-18 10.00% 7.40 57.25% 49.17%
    298 Cal State Monterey Bay West CCAA 3-16 15.79% 7.26 48.58% 50.59%

  13. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Well this will surely look a lot different at the top after the week we all had! I bet CBU retains the top spot, but WWU and Chico will tumble.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by CCAA_Fanatic View Post
    Well this will surely look a lot different at the top after the week we all had! I bet CBU retains the top spot, but WWU and Chico will tumble.
    WOU has swept CWU rather convincingly and CWU is ahead of WOU in these rankings ... fraud rankings.

  15. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by tsull View Post
    WOU has swept CWU rather convincingly and CWU is ahead of WOU in these rankings ... fraud rankings.
    It is a power ranking. It doesn't take into consideration head-to-head. As with all power ranking systems, there are flaws. That is why it isn't the only tool used by the committee to pick teams for post season. It is basically used to break ties in the event that the other criteria can't separate teams. You just need your Wolves to keep winning!

  16. #16

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W%
    10 San Francisco State West CCAA 17-3 85.00% 16.05 49.07% 51.52%
    13 Chico State West CCAA 16-4 80.00% 15.90 53.52% 51.37%
    16 California Baptist West PWC 20-2 90.91% 15.82 47.96% 50.47%
    17 UC San Diego West CCAA 16-5 76.19% 15.76 54.59% 51.00%
    19 Hawai'i Pacific West PWC 16-1 94.12% 15.41 42.10% 50.97%
    21 Sonoma State West CCAA 15-5 75.00% 15.40 54.59% 50.79%
    37 Western Washington West GNAC 16-5 76.19% 14.76 50.40% 50.31%
    47 Dixie State West PWC 16-5 76.19% 14.38 47.44% 51.57%
    62 Alaska Anchorage West GNAC 13-5 72.22% 13.78 49.23% 50.08%
    71 Cal State San Marcos West CCAA 10-7 58.82% 13.59 55.90% 51.51%
    90 Concordia (Calif.) West PWC 12-8 60.00% 13.20 54.42% 49.60%
    94 Cal State San Bernardino West CCAA 10-8 55.56% 13.11 52.17% 51.71%
    95 Chaminade West PWC 14-6 70.00% 13.10 43.82% 50.04%
    116 Western Oregon West GNAC 12-9 57.14% 12.57 52.86% 50.46%
    123 Cal Poly Pomona West CCAA 8-10 44.44% 12.33 57.60% 50.86%
    132 Montana State Billings West GNAC 12-8 60.00% 12.15 44.93% 50.79%
    134 Central Washington West GNAC 10-8 55.56% 12.11 50.21% 50.21%
    157 Northwest Nazarene West GNAC 8-9 47.06% 11.65 52.34% 50.17%
    159 Azusa Pacific West PWC 10-13 43.48% 11.61 56.40% 49.62%
    160 Cal State LA West CCAA 10-11 47.62% 11.57 49.75% 50.58%
    160 Point Loma West PWC 12-9 57.14% 11.57 45.42% 50.03%
    162 Cal State Dominguez Hills West CCAA 9-9 50.00% 11.50 47.00% 50.81%
    165 Cal State East Bay West CCAA 11-11 50.00% 11.32 47.07% 50.75%
    170 Saint Martin's West GNAC 9-10 47.37% 11.21 49.42% 50.83%
    179 Seattle Pacific West GNAC 10-12 45.45% 11.05 50.78% 49.89%
    215 Humboldt State West CCAA 7-11 38.89% 10.22 46.05% 50.73%
    217 Alaska West GNAC 9-12 42.86% 10.14 47.83% 50.30%
    228 Concordia (Ore.) West GNAC 6-12 33.33% 9.83 52.19% 50.70%
    231 Dominican (Calif.) West PWC 7-14 33.33% 9.76 49.65% 48.66%
    251 Stanislaus State West CCAA 6-16 27.27% 9.23 50.72% 50.40%
    262 Academy of Art West PWC 5-14 26.32% 8.74 47.42% 49.54%
    264 Hawai'i Hilo West PWC 5-13 27.78% 8.72 52.33% 49.09%
    282 BYU-Hawaii West PWC 4-14 22.22% 8.06 51.53% 48.60%
    284 Fresno Pacific West PWC 4-17 19.05% 8.05 52.11% 47.86%
    288 Notre Dame de Namur West PWC 3-16 15.79% 7.84 52.56% 48.38%
    289 Holy Names West PWC 5-16 23.81% 7.81 42.70% 48.98%
    291 Cal State Monterey Bay West CCAA 3-18 14.29% 7.76 49.69% 50.55%
    297 Simon Fraser West GNAC 2-20 9.09% 7.32 56.36% 49.22%

  17. #17

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by CCAA_Fanatic View Post
    Chico will tumble.
    Apparently not too badly. Both Sonoma and SF are 75% or higher and Chico was on the road, so that is the absolute best-case scenario for Chico to take a loss, making these games worth 11 points. On top of this, Sonoma was one of Chico's past opponents. Their win put them at the 75% bracket, which means that the previous game they played suddenly became worth 3 more points.

    Additionally, one other game happened this week that gave Chico a boost - San Diego got another win, which put them above the 75% threshold as well. That's another 3 points - on two previous games.

    So effectively, both games this week were worth 15.5 points when you factor in the other movement. They had a 15.94 before this week, so you do the math, and we see it didn't have much effect on them.
    Chico now sits in a very shaky spot as previous opponents San Diego (x2), Sonoma (x2), and Dominguez (x1) are all one loss away from dropping below 75%.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    The performance indicator is a crude approximation of the relative strength of each team. It is probably only accurate to within 3-5 places in the regional ranking. Why it is used to seed the regional if the other criteria do not produce a clear winner is beyond me, as the other criteria are probably more accurate as a whole. It is just an attempt to keep the committee from exercising any judgment on the body of work of each team. As CCAA-Fanatic points out - one win or loss by an opponent (not involving your team) can have a significant on its ranking. I noticed earlier in the year that UAA's PI changed about 1 point and they didn't even play a game. This system also doesn't give any qualitative credit to the wins/losses, so a 30 point blowout is the same as a 1 point win in OT. If we are going to use a system based criteria, I would actually prefer Dave Wilson's at talismanred.com. It would be far more accurate. But I think it takes margin of victory into account and do we want to encourage teams to run up the score on lesser opponents - probably not. I frankly do not like any formulaic criteria. If it was other than a few AD's from west region schools making the decision, such criteria would not be necessary. But that is a whole other issue.

  19. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Perhaps a better approach would require a minimum of two teams from each west region conference, i.e. CCAA, GNAC, and PCW, and then use the top two PI average of remaining teams to fill the eight teams for the West Regional. I believe the current automatic berth of one team per conference in the West Region should be improved to allow a better representation of all three conferences.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by GNACHOOPS View Post
    Perhaps a better approach would require a minimum of two teams from each west region conference, i.e. CCAA, GNAC, and PCW, and then use the top two PI average of remaining teams to fill the eight teams for the West Regional. I believe the current automatic berth of one team per conference in the West Region should be improved to allow a better representation of all three conferences.
    I like the 1-team bid, puts a lot of meaning on the regular season and conference tourney, unlike D-1, which was talking about 11 teams from the ACC getting in. The GNAC isn't powerful this year and might only deserve one bid, I'm not sure. Reward conferences for having great years. The GNAC might sneak 2 in, but the CCAA and PacWest have better teams at the top, IMO. No need to hand out consolation berths for teams that don't deserve it.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •