Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 202

Thread: Performance Indicators 2016-17

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Evansville, IN
    Posts
    4,177
    Contribute to D2
    Rep Power
    55450

    Default Performance Indicators 2016-17

    You guys know the drill now. Same as before. See this link for details on how the numbers are crunched.

    Here's my numbers after the first weekend of games. (I know, they mean absolutely nothing with such little data, but hey, I had to post them while USI was ranked above BU, KWC, Indy, UWP, Drury, and such. This may be my only chance to say that!)
    As a side note, it's so nice to see so many of our Midwest teams involved in the crossover tourneys this weekend. It's rare for me to have so many schools with two D2 games in the books after the first weekend.


    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional%
    2 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 19.50 50.00% 50.00% 2-0 100.00%
    2 Truman State Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 19.50 50.00% 50.00% 2-0 100.00%
    9 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 19.00 50.00% 50.00% 2-0 100.00%
    26 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 16.00 25.00% 75.00% 2-0 100.00%
    32 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 15.00 75.00% 25.00% 1-1 50.00%
    32 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 2-0 100.00% 15.00 25.00% 75.00% 2-0 100.00%
    32 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 15.00 75.00% 25.00% 1-1 50.00%
    58 Ohio Dominican Midwest GLIAC 1-0 100.00% 14.00 0.00% 100.00% 1-0 100.00%
    65 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 13.50 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    65 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 13.50 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    83 Hillsdale Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 13.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
    83 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 13.00 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    104 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    104 Findlay Midwest GLIAC 1-0 100.00% 12.00 0.00% 100.00% 1-0 100.00%
    104 Lewis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    104 Saint Joseph's Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    104 Walsh Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 12.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
    142 Quincy Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 11.50 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    142 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 1-1 50.00% 11.50 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    151 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 0-1 0.00% 11.00 100.00% 0.00% 0-1 0.00%
    159 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 1-1 50.00% 10.50 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    159 Malone Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 0.00% 0-2 0.00%
    159 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 10.50 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    159 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 0.00% 0-2 0.00%
    191 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 1-1 50.00% 10.00 25.00% 75.00% 1-1 50.00%
    207 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 9.00 25.00% 75.00% 1-1 50.00%
    207 Lake Erie Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 9.00 75.00% 25.00% 0-2 0.00%
    207 Salem International Midwest GMAC 0-1 0.00% 9.00 100.00% 0.00% 0-1 0.00%
    207 Tiffin Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 9.00 75.00% 25.00% 0-2 0.00%
    240 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 7.50 50.00% 50.00% 0-2 0.00%
    240 Maryville Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 7.50 50.00% 50.00% 0-2 0.00%
    258 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 6.00 50.00% 50.00% 0-2 0.00%

    No data for:
    Davis & Elkins
    Drury
    Lake Superior State
    McKendree
    Missouri S&T
    Oakland City
    Rockhurst
    William Jewell
    Last edited by schnautza; 11-13-2016 at 10:26 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    western Kentucky
    Posts
    9,029
    Rep Power
    21789

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Thanks, schnautza! Massey and Tallisman Red have not posted their ratings with any games yet. They do have their projected ratings up, but they mean nothing until they start entering games. This indicator has always been pretty accurate.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    For those of you who like to use the mobile devices exclusively, I also just figured out how to make the table scrollable horizontally so you can see all the columns. I'll try to remember to add that snippet of code every time I post.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    western Kentucky
    Posts
    9,029
    Rep Power
    21789

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    It's already working. Undoubtedly, we are happy you can share this with us. You represent the best at usi

  5. #5

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    BTW - Salem International is no longer a G-MAC school. They are now Independent.

    BTW2 - Thanks for doing this.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    North Central WV
    Posts
    2,354
    Rep Power
    993

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by BlueBlood View Post
    BTW - Salem International is no longer a G-MAC school. They are now Independent.

    BTW2 - Thanks for doing this.
    BTW3 - Malone is a G-MAC school. thus no longer in the GLIAC

    BTW4 - Agreed. Thanks for doing this!

  7. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Thank you Schnautza for pulling this together again this year.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Thanks guys, I thought I already fixed those but apparently I didn't. Got 'em now in my spreadsheet.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Lake Superior put up 116 points on UIndy tonight. You can add that into your matrix. Either they are really good or we are really bad.

  10. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    I know last year they smoked us by 20+. The GLIAC was the stronger conference last year and I imagine this will hold true this year.

    Quote Originally Posted by UIndyGradyGreyhound View Post
    Lake Superior put up 116 points on UIndy tonight. You can add that into your matrix. Either they are really good or we are really bad.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by UIndyGradyGreyhound View Post
    Lake Superior put up 116 points on UIndy tonight. You can add that into your matrix. Either they are really good or we are really bad.
    You asked for it. I was going to wait a couple more days, but here you go.

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional%
    1 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 19.50 58.33% 47.22% 2-0 100.00%
    5 Ohio Dominican Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 19.00 50.00% 50.00% 2-0 100.00%
    8 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 1-0 100.00% 18.00 66.67% 50.00% 1-0 100.00%
    15 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 3-0 100.00% 17.67 44.44% 55.56% 3-0 100.00%
    30 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 16.00 25.00% 72.22% 2-0 100.00%
    32 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 2-0 100.00% 15.00 25.00% 66.67% 2-0 100.00%
    32 Drury Midwest GLVC 1-0 100.00% 15.00 33.33% 50.00% 1-0 100.00%
    32 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 1-0 100.00% 15.00 33.33% 66.67% 1-0 100.00%
    32 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 1-0 100.00% 15.00 33.33% 50.00% 1-0 100.00%
    50 Truman State Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 14.67 55.56% 40.74% 2-1 66.67%
    71 Walsh Midwest GLIAC 3-0 100.00% 13.67 11.11% 85.19% 3-0 100.00%
    80 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 13.50 66.67% 37.50% 1-1 50.00%
    80 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 13.50 66.67% 31.94% 1-1 50.00%
    80 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 2-0 100.00% 13.50 12.50% 55.56% 2-0 100.00%
    89 Quincy Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 13.33 44.44% 57.41% 2-1 66.67%
    93 Hillsdale Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 13.00 0.00% 100.00% 2-0 100.00%
    105 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 12.67 33.33% 51.85% 2-1 66.67%
    115 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    115 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    115 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    115 Saint Joseph's Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 50.00% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    145 Lewis Midwest GLVC 1-2 33.33% 11.67 66.67% 48.15% 1-2 33.33%
    154 Findlay Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 11.50 50.00% 38.89% 1-1 50.00%
    185 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 10.50 50.00% 58.33% 1-1 50.00%
    185 Malone Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 5.56% 0-2 0.00%
    185 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 5.56% 0-2 0.00%
    215 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 1-2 33.33% 9.67 50.00% 59.26% 1-2 33.33%
    221 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 9.50 83.33% 8.33% 0-2 0.00%
    225 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 1-2 33.33% 9.33 44.44% 44.44% 1-2 33.33%
    228 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 1-2 33.33% 9.00 55.56% 33.33% 1-2 33.33%
    236 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 1-2 33.33% 8.67 38.89% 55.56% 1-2 33.33%
    248 Lake Erie Midwest GLIAC 0-3 0.00% 8.00 77.78% 25.00% 0-3 0.00%
    248 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 0-1 0.00% 8.00 50.00% 50.00% 0-1 0.00%
    254 Tiffin Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 7.50 66.67% 31.94% 0-2 0.00%
    254 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 7.50 58.33% 47.22% 0-2 0.00%
    270 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 0-3 0.00% 6.67 55.56% 44.44% 0-3 0.00%
    274 Salem International Midwest IND 0-2 0.00% 6.00 58.33% 50.00% 0-2 0.00%
    284 Maryville Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 4.50 33.33% 50.00% 0-2 0.00%
    287 McKendree Midwest GLVC 0-0 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    287 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-0 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0-0 #DIV/0!

  12. #12

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Maybe not such a bad loss anyway then. UIndy needs to get its act together before GLVC play, can't let a D-2 team get 116 points against you. I could understand if we had played IU or Louisville and give up 116, but LSSU?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ypsilanti, MI
    Posts
    303
    Rep Power
    10214

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Is Oakland City even D2? They mostly play very small Christian schools or secondary campuses of larger universities. If they are D2, they'd pretty much have to go undefeated to have any chance of getting a top 8 seed.

    And about Salem International, did they leave the G-MAC on their own or were they kicked out?

  14. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by ftballfan View Post
    Is Oakland City even D2? They mostly play very small Christian schools or secondary campuses of larger universities. If they are D2, they'd pretty much have to go undefeated to have any chance of getting a top 8 seed.

    And about Salem International, did they leave the G-MAC on their own or were they kicked out?
    Oakland City is a member of D2 but does not play a D2 schedule, hence undefeated or not, no NCAA postseason for them. As for Salem, I'm not sure anyone really knows.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional%
    6 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 3-0 100.00% 18.00 47.22% 51.39% 3-0 100.00%
    6 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 1-0 100.00% 18.00 66.67% 50.00% 1-0 100.00%
    6 Drury Midwest GLVC 1-0 100.00% 18.00 50.00% 37.50% 1-0 100.00%
    16 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 4-0 100.00% 17.00 41.67% 66.70% 4-0 100.00%
    31 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 4-0 100.00% 16.00 30.00% 59.97% 3-0 100.00%
    48 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 1-0 100.00% 15.00 25.00% 62.50% 1-0 100.00%
    57 Truman State Midwest GLVC 3-1 75.00% 14.75 40.00% 47.81% 3-1 75.00%
    57 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 3-1 75.00% 14.75 48.75% 55.10% 3-1 75.00%
    62 Ohio Dominican Midwest GLIAC 2-1 66.67% 14.67 55.56% 43.38% 2-1 66.67%
    62 Walsh Midwest GLIAC 3-0 100.00% 14.67 16.67% 81.25% 3-0 100.00%
    62 Saint Joseph's Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 14.67 55.56% 53.94% 2-1 66.67%
    94 Hillsdale Midwest GLIAC 3-0 100.00% 13.67 8.33% 87.50% 3-0 100.00%
    98 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 13.50 62.50% 46.25% 1-1 50.00%
    109 Quincy Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 13.33 41.67% 55.32% 2-1 66.67%
    109 Findlay Midwest GLIAC 2-1 66.67% 13.33 41.67% 57.64% 2-1 66.67%
    118 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 13.00 66.67% 33.33% 1-1 50.00%
    132 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 12.67 41.67% 47.18% 2-1 66.67%
    137 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 2-2 50.00% 12.50 56.25% 35.63% 2-2 50.00%
    150 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 37.50% 50.00% 1-1 50.00%
    184 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 2-2 50.00% 11.00 43.75% 40.73% 2-2 50.00%
    184 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-1 0.00% 11.00 100.00% 30.00% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    201 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 10.67 16.67% 65.97% 2-1 66.67%
    201 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 0-3 0.00% 10.67 100.00% 22.22% 0-3 0.00%
    208 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 1-3 25.00% 10.50 66.67% 39.56% 1-3 25.00%
    208 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 10.50 50.00% 52.78% 1-1 50.00%
    208 Malone Midwest GMAC 0-2 0.00% 10.50 100.00% 12.50% 0-2 0.00%
    208 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 1-3 25.00% 10.50 66.67% 39.56% 1-3 25.00%
    224 Lewis Midwest GLVC 1-3 25.00% 10.00 62.50% 55.56% 1-3 25.00%
    224 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 1-3 25.00% 10.00 62.50% 37.15% 1-3 25.00%
    241 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 1-3 25.00% 9.25 52.08% 41.25% 1-3 25.00%
    241 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 1-3 25.00% 9.25 43.75% 41.67% 1-3 25.00%
    245 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 0-3 0.00% 9.00 80.00% 25.97% 0-3 0.00%
    261 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 8.50 83.33% 20.83% 0-2 0.00%
    278 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 7.50 58.33% 45.83% 0-2 0.00%
    283 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 0-4 0.00% 7.25 64.58% 41.18% 0-4 0.00%
    290 Lake Erie Midwest GLIAC 0-3 0.00% 6.00 52.78% 49.35% 0-3 0.00%
    290 Tiffin Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 6.00 37.50% 50.00% 0-2 0.00%
    290 Salem International Midwest IND 0-2 0.00% 6.00 50.00% 55.21% 0-2 0.00%
    290 Maryville Midwest GLVC 0-3 0.00% 6.00 41.67% 44.44% 0-3 0.00%
    305 McKendree Midwest GLVC 0-0 0.00% 0.00 0.00% 0.00% 0-0 #DIV/0!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Denton County, TX
    Posts
    10,933
    Rep Power
    172486

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by kwcpantherfan View Post
    Oakland City is a member of D2 but does not play a D2 schedule, hence undefeated or not, no NCAA postseason for them. As for Salem, I'm not sure anyone really knows.
    Don't even get me started on Oakland City... Most of the MW board regulars know how I feel about that situation. And, as I recall, the unofficial reports were that Salem was kicked out of the G-MAC (or some variation thereof). I thought Salem was going to drop to the NAIA, to be honest.

  17. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by ctrabs74 View Post
    Don't even get me started on Oakland City... Most of the MW board regulars know how I feel about that situation. And, as I recall, the unofficial reports were that Salem was kicked out of the G-MAC (or some variation thereof). I thought Salem was going to drop to the NAIA, to be honest.
    FWIW I agree with you on Oakland City. They shouldn't count as a D2 game. Fact is, they do ... so you can hardly fault schools for playing them when they're within such a close radius. Believe me, though, I'd much rather see us play a USI or Bellarmine or even UMSL or Indy or someone like that that is maybe a little farther away but still a better game.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Quote Originally Posted by ctrabs74 View Post
    Don't even get me started on Oakland City... Most of the MW board regulars know how I feel about that situation. And, as I recall, the unofficial reports were that Salem was kicked out of the G-MAC (or some variation thereof). I thought Salem was going to drop to the NAIA, to be honest.
    For the record, I've never heard a credible explanation regarding their departure. They turned around and scheduled most of the former G-MAC teams for out-of-conference games this year, so I wouldn't think there is much (if any) bad blood. I still wonder if their status as a for-profit institution was a hindrance. There is a lot of language in the G-MAC bylaws that references non-profit status.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Now that everybody in the Midwest has at least one D2 game on the books, here is the update.

    RANK Team Region Conference Record Win% P.I. O.W% O.O.W% Regional Record Regional%
    1 Missouri S&T Midwest GLVC 1-0 100.00% 21.00 75.00% 37.50% 1-0 100.00%
    7 Drury Midwest GLVC 1-0 100.00% 18.00 50.00% 43.75% 1-0 100.00%
    10 Ferris State Midwest GLIAC 4-0 100.00% 17.75 49.17% 54.92% 4-0 100.00%
    14 Saginaw Valley State Midwest GLIAC 4-0 100.00% 17.00 45.42% 65.78% 4-0 100.00%
    25 Southern Indiana Midwest GLVC 4-0 100.00% 16.00 35.83% 57.20% 3-0 100.00%
    54 Bellarmine Midwest GLVC 3-1 75.00% 14.75 47.92% 55.80% 3-1 75.00%
    58 Saint Joseph's Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 14.67 55.56% 54.35% 2-1 66.67%
    64 Lake Superior State Midwest GLIAC 2-0 100.00% 14.50 12.50% 58.33% 2-0 100.00%
    75 Ashland Midwest GLIAC 2-1 66.67% 14.00 52.78% 49.40% 2-1 66.67%
    84 Walsh Midwest GLIAC 4-0 100.00% 13.75 10.00% 83.75% 4-0 100.00%
    89 Ohio Dominican Midwest GLIAC 2-1 66.67% 13.67 55.56% 40.19% 2-1 66.67%
    101 Quincy Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 13.33 41.67% 55.97% 2-1 66.67%
    102 Truman State Midwest GLVC 3-1 75.00% 13.25 36.25% 50.94% 3-1 75.00%
    112 Kentucky Wesleyan Midwest GMAC 3-2 60.00% 13.00 52.00% 41.83% 3-2 60.00%
    130 William Jewell Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 12.67 41.67% 48.47% 2-1 66.67%
    140 Findlay Midwest GLIAC 2-1 66.67% 12.33 40.00% 46.33% 2-1 66.67%
    140 Rockhurst Midwest GLVC 1-2 33.33% 12.33 75.00% 34.40% 1-2 33.33%
    148 Lewis Midwest GLVC 2-3 40.00% 12.20 68.00% 47.52% 2-3 40.00%
    152 Wayne State (Mich.) Midwest GLIAC 1-1 50.00% 12.00 42.50% 46.00% 1-1 50.00%
    174 Hillsdale Midwest GLIAC 3-1 75.00% 11.50 16.25% 77.94% 3-1 75.00%
    184 Cedarville Midwest GMAC 2-3 40.00% 11.20 60.00% 38.00% 2-3 40.00%
    198 Northern Michigan Midwest GLIAC 2-3 40.00% 10.80 56.33% 46.79% 2-3 40.00%
    201 Wisconsin-Parkside Midwest GLVC 2-1 66.67% 10.67 21.67% 62.94% 2-1 66.67%
    201 Ohio Valley Midwest GMAC 0-3 0.00% 10.67 91.67% 23.89% 0-3 0.00%
    205 Michigan Tech Midwest GLIAC 1-3 25.00% 10.50 70.42% 44.60% 1-3 25.00%
    205 Missouri-St. Louis Midwest GLVC 1-1 50.00% 10.50 50.00% 53.75% 1-1 50.00%
    218 Malone Midwest GMAC 0-3 0.00% 10.00 91.67% 12.08% 0-3 0.00%
    218 Indianapolis Midwest GLVC 1-3 25.00% 10.00 60.42% 34.03% 1-3 25.00%
    243 McKendree Midwest GLVC 0-1 0.00% 9.00 75.00% 37.50% 0-1 0.00%
    253 Trevecca Nazarene Midwest GMAC 1-4 20.00% 8.60 48.33% 38.25% 1-4 20.00%
    256 Alderson Broaddus Midwest GMAC 1-3 25.00% 8.50 40.00% 48.13% 1-3 25.00%
    263 Oakland City Midwest IND 0-2 0.00% 8.00 62.50% 28.47% 0-0 #DIV/0!
    274 Grand Valley State Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 7.50 58.33% 45.83% 0-2 0.00%
    278 Davis & Elkins Midwest GMAC 0-4 0.00% 7.25 63.33% 32.24% 0-4 0.00%
    281 Illinois Springfield Midwest GLVC 0-2 0.00% 7.00 58.33% 35.00% 0-2 0.00%
    290 Northwood Midwest GLIAC 0-4 0.00% 6.50 62.08% 46.28% 0-4 0.00%
    290 Lake Erie Midwest GLIAC 0-4 0.00% 6.50 54.58% 47.53% 0-4 0.00%
    290 Maryville Midwest GLVC 1-3 25.00% 6.50 32.50% 50.10% 1-3 25.00%
    295 Tiffin Midwest GLIAC 0-2 0.00% 6.00 42.50% 46.00% 0-2 0.00%
    302 Salem International Midwest IND 0-2 0.00% 4.50 50.00% 54.17% 0-2 0.00%

  20. Default Re: Performance Indicators 2016-17

    Missouri S&T coach should get a contract extension based on these #s lol

Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •